. I bought all the MOFI releases and Love them, the Analogue productionsMiles davis Mono releases and Now I need a good KOB copy. Progress, what is it with that word that it manges to bug me so often? Stereo promos leapfrog the expected alphabetic progression jumping fromE (5th cutting) to AE (16th cutting). The Holy Grail, Kind of Blue, six eye stereo KoB 3. What is the slight distortion that is present in every copy of KOB I've ever heard? 1A/1AE)with the Side 2 track-list error corrected, so stereo lacquer 1A was used only in later pressings, not in any early stereo pressing run. Did the 2022 Revolver mono vinyl LP from the box set come in a stereo jacket? Different listening experience. Thanks Mikey. It is not known how many labels with the side 2 error were printed, but the presence of the Side 2 error is proof of earlypressing status 8/59 to 11/59. I dont know if this was the case during the original release, but seeing that sometimes it was intentionally done to get a different result it brings in to question the validity of the subsequent remasters. Columbia may eventually have arrived at aneat andorderly system of lacquer distribution withthis combination of plants, but the evidence from Kind of Blue shows that was not how the system worked in 1959. The very few commercial mono copies were found with matrix codes in the range 1A to 1C on both sides (five records only in the sample, they are very rare), all had the Side 2 track-list error. Has anyone compared the Sony's Miles reissues to MoFi's? Surely you've read enough about how it dispensed with chord changes (etc.) Controversial in some quarters, but I agree. Mono or Stereo - is it really just a matter of preference? The most frequently found are in, order of magnitude, AJ, AD, BC, AA, AE and AG. Or the mono tapes went missing. My search is over trying to find the perfect pressing, sorry MOFI and Classic records. The basic difference with the stereo masters was that after the same type of process, the stereo masters were pumped up a few DB across the board with Volume Compression. The suffix -1B is visible on mono Side 1 and seller described both sides 1B/1B. It is a sort of rattling sound. Free shipping for many products! Is there any evidence to indicate that the mono was mixed from the same 3-track tape as the stereo? The three-track recording produced three distinct channels and nothing you could legitimately call "stereo". Other fonts were used by printers for other plant locations. HARRY T BOOKER Mister Is Blue MONO/STEREO 45 Promo Rare Soul WB - eBay Unfortunately for vinyl fans, there were reportedly widespread problems with the vinyl, thanks to poor, noisy pressings. They were only on CD or SACD at that point since vinyl was done by Classic. Did Teo ever say why he hated the Sony releases? Most but not all lacquers used to press promos (A, G,D and H) went on to be used to press the commercial release. Another waxed lyrical over a 1A/1B six-eye stereo RARE! The stereo releases from 1959 to 1992 had the songs on side-A slightly sharp in pitch. "Scarborough Fair" sounds better in mono, but the rest of the "PSRT" album is killer in stereo. Unless you can come up with one of those original LPs, this is as good a sounding Kind of Blue as you will find. Kind of Blue - Mono vs Stereo - Head-Fi kind of blue mono or stereo hoffman. Barcode and Other Identifiers Barcode: 4 547366 450958 Other Versions (5 of 502) View All Recommendations Kind Of Blue Miles Davis 3D-imaging and the wide, deep soundstage are eyebrow-raising; these Davis mono remaster titles sold me on other mono remasters, and rival (IMHO, to my ears) the Columbia/Legacy 180g six-eye stereo remaster I bought last year. There's zero evidence the speed issue was anything other than a technical fault with one of the tape machines. Those who have recognized it have shared many wild theories. Have you read Fremer's review? Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by youraveragevinylcollector, Mar 22, 2016. I have three different versions. Of all the large number of combinations of lacquer pairs, just two stand out as being symetrical: 1D/1D and 1J/1J. At 1D on both sides, Side 2 was found in both correct and incorrect track listing order i.e. kind of blue mono or stereo hoffman Stereo Audio Files. It very well may have been erased and the tape re-used. The original mono LPs did not have this problem because they were cut from a different tape from a different recorder. Miles Davis "Kind of Blue" Monophonic Reissue From Sony/Legacy: An Is that it? Sometimes that works okay but other times not. Even *if* Macero had been involved, any changes he would have made would have been at the mix stage, not the recording stage. Even more amazing that no one has taken on a project to "clean it up", or to maybe offer a cleaned and an uncleaned version side by side, so as to appease the purists. Check out www.recordstoreday.com. Kind of Blue Mono & Stereo Collector's Edition 2LP Set 180 gram, 33 rpm, Collector's Edition, Gatefold, Mono. In the early days of "stereo" the mono mix especially of popular and rock music) was the one that got the most attention. The process-control system to keep track of lacquers, mothers and stampers did not require matching or sequencing, becauseit did not matter which lacquer was used, as they were all the same as long as you had a Side 1 and a Side 2 stamper mounted in the press. Either way he claimed that he hated the Sony releases. It looks like all of these were mixed at 24/192k (not in the analog domain). None of these letters ever appear at any later date up to modern times. Where? Also, I've known a few people who bought one and then later upgraded when the used-record bug started biting. Needle doctor even sells them. Which Beatles Mono Collection? - Music in General - Audiophile Style The vinyl isnow secondand the SACD is third on the list (IMHO). I plan on making a home brew unit soon, $600 to do it right. Yes, hearing "stereo" was exciting for me too, but over time I've come to realize that much of what was called "stereo" was just mono channels divided between the channels. Fortuitously, an error was made in the track listing of the Side 2 label. When used as one center channel in an old school mono configuration, the sound stage/window can be rather small and wimpy, unlike live performers spread out over a real stage. p.s. Mono tracks send only one channel for all speakers. Yes, Columbia switched to the RIAA curve in the mid-fifties. http://www.musiconvinyl.com/catalog/miles-davis/kind-of-blue-mono#more, Question about Music on vinyl and Columbia/sony legacy, the speed "error" situation.is not an error or oversight. The artist name and album title are set in Erbar Light Condensed font, used by Bridgeport and which went on to be used in label printing for Pitman. Each lacquer is merely one cutting from the first master tape mix, all manufactured at the same time. FIRST! This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. For some records, possibly. UPDATE 12/08/19: a copy with 1F has been found, with track listing error Side 2 1D/1F with TA etching (Conn. plant). Yes I know that I'm being rather harsh but I have had it with all of Stereophile's bs and worthless information. The importance of wires, auditioning methods and othertips. There must be a mechanical reason why they are mostly though not always offset mirrored pairs (Side 1 stamper from one lacquer, side 2 stamper from another lacquer)and not symmetrical pairs (e.g.1E/1E), possibly to run two presses simultaneously, or to ensure metal sets from each lacquer wear equally, but that is for another day. Rest assured, what you are hearing is what was recorded. The presence of an 1Aor 1B on one side, and a higher value on the other, is not an early mono pressing, obviously. Also what comes to trusting the recommendations of people on audio forums, I stopped paying any attention to what critics of any kind music, audio, or otherwise have to say years ago, but the people who write their opinions on audio forums I have equally low faith in. Mix - Miles Davis - Kind Of Blue Vinyl LP Review And Comparison What Version Is The Best Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Cannonball Adderley, and more Miles Davis - Kind Of Blue (FULL MONO LP. I own this one along with the 1997 re-issue and a 35DP-62 Japan for US. Kind of Blue sounds about the same as the stereo CDs, because it's mixed down from the same 3-track tape (the mono masters are, by some accounts, worn out; by other accounts, missing). A lacquer includes Side 1 and Side 2. Don't prejudge! Another, more welcome, discovery on inspecting the master tapes was that a complete alternate take of one tune still existed. The problem is that nobody knows what happened to the mono master tape. However, compared to my later "6-eye" 1AJ pressing, the reissue sounds far less "milky-cloudy" and far more transparent to the source, without veering off into the analytical. Hence the stereo (but not the mono) releases of Kind of Blue and virtually all the releases were stereo had always had those three tracks playing at slightly the wrong pitch. 8 Decca? Metal from 1A and 1B lacquers was still being used some years later, mix and match. Kind of Blue on one line or two, in a variety of different fonts. It was my understanding that the 2x45rpm MoFi reissue we've been waiting two years for was going to be mono as well? If you are familiar with any DCC audiophile releases, then you already know Steve. Vinyl LP included is in stereo and was wondering (as a guy whos relatively new to jazz) whether Miles Davis (and any jazz record pre-1968-69) should be listened to in mono or stereo? Released 17 August 1959 on Columbia (catalog no. One of these assumptions is wrong by a factor of ten, crazy, but we find what we find. Location: Carbondale, IL USA. It amazes me that so few hear or recognize the distortion present throughout, especially on So What. Looking forward to this reissue, like all of Miles' albums I have both Mono and Stereo originals (1C Mono KOB). Does your copy say "Music on Vinyl"? I've read similar reviews where the mono version is now their favourite version beating the Classic 200g version and the Mo-Fi 2X45. Mono vs. In the case of Stereo, six lacquers account for half of all the copies manufactured, none of which are single alphabetic 1A to 1L. Though lacquers were cut and numbered sequentially at the point of manufacture, for Kind of Blue at least, they were not drawn for use sequentially. affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network, and Unanswered Question Conventional Wisdom does not explaintheasymmetrical pairing is Side 1 and Side2 lacquers. Milestones was manufactured through a similar process as Kind of Blue . Matrix 1A/1A with Side 2 track-listing error, an example. Have a look. Or so Conventional Wisdom suggests. Give me a rest from dissecting records. Most Columbia pressings have asymmetrical non-sequential pairings, such as 1D/1AC. Miles Davis Mono or Stereo? : r/vinyl - Reddit Why didn't they use the orginal mono tapes? Kind of Blue mono promo jacket codes 2 (NY), 4 and 6 (IN). With 1D (different printer and pressing location?) I just finished comparing the HD tracks 24/192 wave files with theJapanese SACD and the Legacy vinyl (not the poorly pressed blue vinyl). Both the mono and the stereo originals display the same pitch problem, that went un-corrected for decades. CL 1355; Vinyl LP). Bonus enjoyment if you have a 5.1 setup. This was corrected (ie order reversed) on the label of commercial release pressings, at the instruction of Teo Macero, around November 1959. Columbia-CBS US (1961-67) The Six-Eye Columbias were the stars of Fifties audiophile recording engineering and pressing, however, however around 1961 corporate changes at Columbia were signalled by the introduction of the "CBS" name in addition to "Columbia". Arthur. Now I'm curious if I should drop more cash on 'Round About Midnight Columbia Mono they just released. There are pictures of some of the models as well. Based in Holland, Music On Vinyl uses the Record Industry plant in Haarlem the largest surviving vinyl pressing plant in Europe and one of the top three in terms of quality, along with Pallas and Optimal in Germany. Audiogon Discussion Forum I can crank the MoFi much more and it just fills the room, letting the music breathe. This is the first take of Flamenco Sketches. Early, late, etc? Thanks again Michael! If you mean at the beginning I'd say that is "sympathetic vibrations" and microphone leakage. Worse: later, rare combinations such as 1AC/1AA are found with and without the Side 2 error. Mostauction copieshave the corrected Side 2 label, but some sellers claim theirs isan original first pressing, simply because it is a Six-Eye label. I even threw in the 90's SBM cd for the hell of it. Another fifteen lacquers contribute to the final tally of all those found. I'm not sure which transfer, mix and master the mono mix on HDTracks is, but I just ordered myself a copy of the limited edition mono vinyl only a couple days ago. Do you expect much improvement over the Classic Records stereo 45 release from the 90s? No point now crying over degaussed tape or whatever happened. Hence the stereo (but not the mono) releases of Kind of Blue and virtually all the releases were stereo had always had those three tracks playing at slightly the wrong pitch. All promos (and very early commercial pressings) have the Side 2 track-listing error. (The fault in the tape recorder which caused this had been corrected by the time of the second session in April.) :thmbsp: Monaural Cartridge Miyajima: " Spirit MONO high out-put " p.s. One of the few samples found where the matrix codes Side 1 and Side 2 are taken the same lacquer. I usually like it when you're reactionary, but this seems kind of pointless. The two channel mix down will most likely be the source of a Mobile Fidelity stereo reissue coming later in the year as part of that label's Miles Davis stereo vinyl reissue project. No, by the time I got interested in old mono pressings, the price on Piper had gotten too high. OPENING HOURS MON-THURS: 16-00 FRI-SAT: 16-02 . Any recuts would be the next higher number for that plant. For this reason, it doesnt really matter whether your copy is a Bridgeport, Pitman, Terre Haute or Hollywood. All Blues 2. affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network, and Back in 1992 Wilder discovered the KOB speed anomaly that resulted in side one of the original album being slightly sharp in pitch because the 3 track recorder was running slightly slow during the recording session. The mono original (and reissue) provides a better overall instrumental balance, with greater emphasis on the piano and more solid imaging. Simon & Garfunkel Mono Vs Stereo Discussion : r/vinyl - Reddit Mostly these are high values like BC/BGand BH/BJ , close to the CBS overprint and transition to two-eye label (1962/63) where lacquers from the third cohort 1CA to 1CL begin to appear. The number of channels used while recording and listening to audio is the primary distinction between Mono and Stereo sound. Both mixes on HDTracks are completely NEW remasters. KoB was recorded onto 3 machines, 2 for stereo and 1 for mono. At one point, in theearlymid60s, five plantswere in simultaneous operation, which helpsexplain whymultiple laquers were being cut to supportpressing of consistent quality at many different locations. Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host Location: Los Angeles CA, USA Adagio said: 6 Imperial Packing Co., Inc. of Indianapolis, IN when suppling West Coast pressing plant 1A promo is extremely rare, none came to light in reviewing several thousand auctions, so perhaps a keeper, rarely sold.). It's not hard to find a reasonably priced version of most things, but given the amount of pressings, remasters etc of Kind of Blue - it's a f***ing minefield. Symmetrical (1A/1A) and sequential pairs (1A/1B) are actually a quite rare occurrence. The reissue's mix down from three tracks to one has been so skillfully and carefully done, even veteran mono KOB listeners might have difficulty guessing the source were that the only criterion. See Promo Cover Fabricator new section below). Apparently it is the one that Miles Davis actually approved and gave input on. Canadian pressings, from 1954 through 1971, were pressed by Quality Records Ltd. for Columbia Records Of Canada Ltd. Should the Miles mono reissues ideally be played with a mono cart? Cookie Notice And it makes sense in local marketing expertise: getting promos to their local radio station disk jockeys. And remember: with limited tracks available in the early days of multitrack recorders, groups would record and fill all four tracks then mix those down to one track. At their web site? Instead, instruments were left/center/right with the two track mix folding the center channel to both the left and right channels. The Radio Museum website lists several Hoffman consoles from 1959 which is a plausible year for one of the early stereo "two-box" style consoles. It was a little nondiscript record store on Lincoln Blvd. CBS overprint non-DG illustrated below (1962/3). Where a piece published after 26th October 2012 appears which is linked to this activity, the text will be followed by the following symbol:(pp), Website styled by Richard Bateman using the Broadsheet Theme for WordPress, London Jazz News Logo designed by Mike Lloyd @Yellow Design, As regards liablity for consequences of any action taken in response to information provided on LondonJazz, we adopt, All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by. I wonder how a fancy (like Mikey's German unit) or homebrew ultrasonic would do for getting the embedded plastic grunge off? The prime stereo tape recorder had been running just over one percent slow, so on playback and during the mastering of albums it ran a little fast. It sounds like a microphone that is being over-driven. It's not distortion. The stereo is better seperated. Doesnt mean there arent others higher, just not in my sample. With copies of KoB being pressed at three or four plants, it seems likely individual plants had their own work procedures. I suspect the mono masters were damaged or very worn, and didn't meet technical standards. A further four lacquers BB, BG, AL and BH, take us up to the three-quarter mark of all stereo copies manufactured. starbucks red cup campaign; best practice interventions debriefing; toni cornell height; shafer middle school staff; who are lester holt's parents; lift up the downtrodden meaning; My heart always sinks when I read those words. Probably got the high rez files from Sterling and pressed them at their own pressing plant (Record Industry, which presses great records). I have an original copy of "Round Midnight" that I bought in Santa Monice back in the 70's. According to Steve Berkowitz, who, with engineer Mark Wilder, has overseen all of the Miles Davis reissues going back many years, both of the original 3-track tapes used in recent years to produce the SACDs as well as 2008's blue 180g vinyl 50th Anniversary Collection box set (which was poorly pressed on 180g with a lot of noisy non-fill, gee I wonder who pressed it? If you listen to this audio over numerous speakers, the identical call will be replicated to each of them. Kind of Blue is one of wonders of this World Miles and the group were all in their prime. Have a look. You are using an out of date browser. Hopefully I can find one to buy on Record Store Day. Columbia/Sony Legacy CL-1355 (88883761031) 180g mono LP, Mixed by: Mark Wilder/Steve Berkowitz (this reissue), Mastered by: Ryan K. Smith at Sterling Sound, Over the past few Record Store Days Sony/Legacy has slowly been rolling out on 180g vinyl much of the Miles Davis catalog, mastered from original analog tapes. Kind of Blue Wikipdia My initial thought in reply to my questioner was the lazy answer, " it depends which you prefer" . Usually this meant speeding up the playback to keep things sounding tighter.he usually did this by wrapping the capstan of the machine with thin splicing tape. Who knows? A known unknown. Milestone and Round About Midnight were mono-only titles. Kind of Blue, an Album by Miles Davis. Unfortunately, the Kind of Blue mono master tape no longer exists. Now I'm bummed. Last Updated: May 30, 2021 (1A/1D promo found). Sony Legacy were mono, see Michael Framer's review in Analogplanet.com. 4 Imperial Packing Co., Inc. of Indianapolis, IN Perhaps defective, or damaged, they were never put in service. A further five lacquers account for the next quarter of all mono copies: A, B, AC, AD, and AJ. It has cleverly placed itself between the high-end audiophile labels, whose LPs can be very pricey, and the cheap low-end labels, whose noisy pressings can sound like bacon frying. Three jacket manufacture codes fits with the Columbia distributed manufacture model, and fits with there being three pairs of lacquers in use for the promo one pair to each of Columbias three plants. 2 sense. I've looked at the website and so far all I've learned is to find a local participating record store. Looking at theYouTube video and write-upon HD tracks and on the sister site: http://www.audiostream.com/content/miles-davis-kind-blue-again. I'm not going to write about the modal music here. Since the mono tapes apparently no longer exist, recent monophonic reissues (yes, some people do prefer mono) were created by mixing down the three tracks on the backup stereo master to a single track. Flamenco Sketches), US first commercial release six eye label -Stereo, Early vs later pressing Side 2 stereo initialtrack listing error. The question never was answered is this mono pressing all analog? The two bonus tracks are of particular interest. The 2012 stereo is best forgotten. I'd stick with the stereo, that's the version everyone raves about. All the same parentage. All rights reserved. Maybe theyre in your garden shed. (Yeah,they start with an A.) (Model #s B8001, B8005-B8010) Some are listed as 2 chassis units. The SACD always sounded kind of tubby/boomy but the CD is awful compared to these new files. Read John Marks' account of hearing the three-track master tape at Sony Studios. Columbia was a major, not the sort of small operator that would use up wrong labels to save money. Some EQ was used as was a bit of limiting. Desktop 2.1 speakerrig: Lenovo IdeaCentre A730 Windows 8.1 PCFoobar 2000 /Spotify PremiumFiiO E17 DACFiiO E09K headphone ampLepai LP-2020A+ amplifierPolk Audio PSW10 subwooferDayton Audio B652 bookshelf speakers. Stereo promos, like mono,dont follow any -1A -1B -1C patterneither; they are E, K, AC and AE. He claimed back then that sometimes they would vari-speed tracks slightly to change the tempo. Light VC, but there. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising.
Where Do Gavin Williamson's Daughters Go To School,
Articles K