Janoff (1990) summarized the peak intensity standards of TEH, Commission Internationale de l'clairage (CIE), the British Standards Organization, and standards organizations of Australia, Japan, and South Africa. A 40 ft/in standard can generally be effective for aging drivers, given contrast ratios greater than 5:1 (slightly higher for guide signs) and luminance greater than 10 cd/m2for partially reflectorized signs. Hostetter, et al. Over a 10-15 year period beginning in the late 1990s interest in roundabouts has increased exponentially in this country, and more jurisdictions have installed them as their benefits have become better known. More specifically, Curtis et al. Older pedestrians had a slower walking speed with the 15th percentile being 3.03 ft/s (0.9 m/s). The remaining participants said that these distances should be increased. The LI is important to the size requirement determination for a sign in a specific application. and at-grade access (rural or urban). Results showed that the older driver group required a contrast of 20 percent higher than the younger driver group to achieve the discrimination task in this study. Exclusive timing is a countermeasure where traffic signals are used to stop motor vehicle traffic in all directions simultaneously for a phase each cycle, while pedestrians are allowed to cross the street. The problems are somewhat moderated when right turns are initiated from a stop, because the turn can be made more slowly, which reduces difficulties with short radii. Chapter 3 Roadway Geometrics - Pierce County, Washington When the circular green with the green arrow was supplemented by the R10-12 sign LEFT TURN YIELD ON GREEN, only 34 percent of drivers answered correctly. TheHighway Capacity Manual(2010) includes methodology for estimating capacity and level of service at roundabouts. In a laboratory simulation study, Staplin et al. SSD is PC DETECT is a headlamp seeing-distance model that uses the Blackwell and Blackwell (1971, 1980) human contrast sensitivity formulations to calculate the distance at which various types of targets illuminated by headlamps first become visible to approaching drivers, with and without glare from opposing headlights. (1995) concluded that, based on older driver performance, no changes to design PRT values were recommended for ISD, SSD, or decision sight distance (DSD), even though the 85th percentile J values exceeded the AASHTO 2.0-s design standard at 7 of the 14 sites. WebFigure 1: Parameters used to determine length of vertical curve. This makes signal information more accessible over longer intervals. For the 20 sites where injury data were available, there were 3 fatal crashes in the before period, and none in the after period. is influenced by both vertical and horizontal alignment, a design exception
Compared to this, for the 65+ age group, when green arrow was shown with green ball, 86 percent of responses were correct, and when green arrow was shown without a green or red ball, 89 percent of responses were correct. Intersections with changing traffic patterns. There are treatments currently within the Handbook that discuss features at roundabout intersections that can benefit aging drivers; however, roundabouts themselves can be a beneficial treatment over a traditional stop- or signal-controlled intersection if properly designed to meet the needs of that location. WebIntersection Sight Distance Calculator Case No Control Stop Control - Left turn from the minor road Stop Control - Right turn from the minor road Stop Control - Crossing railroad bridge and a car approaching from the opposite direction. to criteria employs a horizontal and vertical alignment and a cross section
(1995): (1) reevaluate the length of pedestrian walk signals due to increasingly wider highways, (2) implement more Barnes Dance signals at major intersections, and (3) provide more YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS signs in the vicinity of heavy pedestrian traffic. sight distance is greater at a location with intersections or driveways
(1995) reported that locating the curb accurately and placing the foot is a matter of some care, particularly for the elderly, the very young, and those with physical disabilities. Five design elements were evaluated: (1) advance warning signs; (2) lane control signs; (3) directional signs; (4) yield treatments; and (5) exit sign treatments. Roundabout Advance Warning Sign Recommended by Lord et al. The tasks ranged from side/rearview mirror glances during turning to reading roadway name signs. Same street name exit sign in Baseline, but placed onto splitter island of intended street exit. (1998) concluded that AASHTO's 2.5-s perception-brake reaction time value is appropriate for highway design, when stopping sight distance is the relevant control. The ONE WAY sign is a familiar regulatory sign and indicates that the required movement of entering traffic is to the right. During a fourth circuit, they were asked to brake to a stop, if they possibly could, if the light changed from green to yellow. (2007) recommended that the supplemental panel bearing the legend "TO TRAFFIC IN CIRCLE" be placed immediately below the R1-2 Yield signs on both sides of the road at the entrance to a roundabout, as shown inFigure 85. Approximately 33 subjects in each of three driver age groups were studied: ages 2040, ages 6569, and age 70 and older. Multiple threatOne or more vehicles stop in the through lane, usually at a crosswalk at an unsignalized intersection. Legibility distance was recorded at the point where subjects correctly read the word. All subjects had a visual acuity of at least 20/40. Traffic flow data were collected during 32 field studies in eight cities in four States, and 3-year crash histories for 189 street segments were obtained from cities in two States. Make traffic signal displays more uniform across the United States, including the warning or amber phase. Most commonly, this is used in the vicinity of the curb ramp to enable the WALK signal to be requested without the pedestrian needing to use a pushbutton. It could be argued that it would be advantageous to provide wider angle lighting coverage to increase the total field of view of aging drivers. May (1992) noted that providing sufficient time to allow motorists to make appropriate turning movements when approaching cross streets can improve safety and reduce congestion, and that consistent street signing across political jurisdictions can be helpful in this regard, as well as presenting an orderly, predictable picture of the region to tourists, business people, and residents. Although Agent emphasized that beacons do not eliminate the problem of drivers who disregard the STOP sign, flashing beacons used in conjunction with STOP signs at isolated intersections or intersections with restricted sight distance have been consistently shown to be effective in decreasing crashes by increasing driver awareness and decreasing approach speeds (California Department of Public Works, 1967; Cribbins and Walton, 1970; Goldblatt, 1977; King, et al., 1978; Lyles, 1980). (2006) involved installing countdown signals at about 700 of the 1,100 signalized intersections in San Francisco. The text Left Lane and Right Lane were added under the corresponding routes, on the sign used in Countermeasure 1. (2000) evaluated the change in crashes following conversion of 24 intersections in urban, suburban, and rural environments in 8 States (California, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, South Carolina, and Vermont) from stop-sign or signal control to modern roundabouts. In the 1994Green Book, these same paragraphs have been placed under a new condition referred to as Case V. The equation used for determining ISD for Case V was simply taken from the Case IIIA (crossing maneuver at a stop-controlled intersection) and Case IIIB (left-turn maneuver from a stop-controlled minor road onto a major road) conditions, with the primary difference between the cases being the distance traveled during the maneuver. Studies have shown that there are age differences in depth and motion perception. crest vertical curve in the road limits sight distance and creates the
Shechtman et al. In an observational field study conducted to determine how aging drivers (age 65 and older) compare with younger drivers during left-turn operations under varying intersection geometries, one variable that showed significant differences in older and younger driver behavior was turning path (Staplin, Harkey, Lococo, and Tarawneh, 1997). Response times were faster for the flashing permissive indications than for the solid indications, and circular indications were better understood than arrow indications. Figure 23. In other words, this represents an attempt to heighten signal conspicuity, while the backplate itself improves signal visibility. One of the common characteristics of these alternative designs is that they typically accommodate left-turns in unique ways, with the end result that left-turns at the intersection are greatly reduced, if not eliminated. A driver who is properly positioned for a downstream maneuver will experience reduced demands for divided attention as s/he nears the intersection. The signal head design was tested at 10 urban intersections in British Columbia, that were originally equipped with the standard signal head design consisting of a 12-in 150-W red light, an 8-in 69-W amber light, and an 8-in 69-W green light, with a yellow backboard. Garvey, Pietrucha, and Meeker (1997) investigated an experimental font in two controlled field studies, using drivers ages 65 to 83. Alternatives 3 and 4 both are described by corner curb line geometries offering ease of turning and good visibility; however, isolated responses to the truncated corner geometry (Alternative 4) indicated concerns that providing too much room in the right-turn path might result in a lack of needed guidance information and could lead to a maneuver error, and that it could be harder to detect pedestrians with this design. Data on pedestrian crossings were grouped into "young" (between the ages of 15 and 60) and "old" (older than 60). AASHTO Guidance | FHWA - Federal Highway The finding that older drivers did not select larger gaps than younger drivers at higher speed roads indicates that they rely exclusively on perceived distance to make gap acceptance judgments. A revision of Case V to determine a minimum required sight distance value which more accurately reflects the perceptual requirements of the left-turn task may therefore be appropriate. Regarding entry widths, 59 percent of the reported cases have single-lane entries, 30 percent have two-lane entries, and 11 percent have three or more lane entry legs. The mean maximum head movement (in one direction) was 86 degrees for the youngest drivers, 72 degrees for drivers ages 40 to 59, 67 degrees for drivers ages 60 to 69, and 59 degrees for drivers age 70+. While the Montpelier, VT, Keck Circle Roundabout was under construction, the Roundabout Demonstration Committee prepared educational materials that included a brochure providing safety rules for drivers and pedestrians, as well as news releases and public service announcements in response to negative public reaction during construction, and negative commentary from local morning radio personalities (Redington, 1997). The 85th percentile aging pedestrian walking speed in that study was 3.4 ft/s. Targets that are especially critical in this regard include shifting lane alignments; changing lane assignments (e.g., when a through lane changes to turn-only operation); a pavement width transition, particularly a reduction across the intersection; and, of course, pedestrians. In a telephone interview, 11.4 percent indicated that they had difficulty crossing the street. With respect to the Hagenauer et al. In both cases, the crash-involved older drivers were more likely to be performing a left-turn maneuver than the younger drivers. Under daytime conditions, series B, C, and D were reported to have indexes of (33 ft/in, 42.5 ft/in, and 50 ft/in), respectively. In a retrospective site-based review and crash analysis that included a detailed investigation of over 400 crashes involving drivers age 65 years and older at 62 sites in Australasia, the lack of separate traffic control for left-turn movements against oncoming traffic (i.e., no protected turn phase) contributed to 23 percent of the crashes (Oxley, et al., 2006). Specifically, analyses of crash and violation types at these sites highlight the aging driver's difficulty in detecting, comprehending, and responding to signs within an appropriate timeframe for the safe completion of intersection maneuvers. If the tangents intersect at metric station 2 + 000.00 (where 2 represents 2 km and 000.00 is 0 meters) and at an elevation of 100 meters above sea level, determine the Vertical Curve - Stopping Sight Distance Overall, the average crash rate was reduced from an average of 5.0 crashes per year to an average of 2.4 crashes per year, which is a reduction of greater than 50 percent. Also, a benefit of the raised-curb median is that it provides a pedestrian refuge. Additionally, all intersections were controlled by traffic-responsive semi-actuated signals, and all left-turn maneuvers were completed during the permissive left-turn phase at all study sites. The NCHRP 5-15 recommendation for maintained intensity levels also establishes a need for in-service intensity performance measurement. The four alternative geometries (depicted inFigure 78) were: (1) a simple circular radius of 18 ft; (2) a simple circular radius of 12 m; (3) a simple circular radius of 48 ft; and (4) a three-sided/truncated curve with the center side measuring 54 ft. This compares to 3.1 s for morning and 3.5 s for afternoon peak times after conversion to roundabouts. There are apparent tradeoffs here, however; the leading sequence was associated with a higher conflict rate with pedestrians and a higher rate of run-the-red conflicts (drivers turning left during the clearance interval for opposing traffic), while the intersections with a lagging sequence were associated with a significantly higher rate of indecision conflicts than the leading intersections due to violations in driver expectancy. The LPI was implemented using a modified, solid-state plug-in signal load switch that had the capacity to delay the change of the traffic signal phase from red to green. Analysis of the North Carolina motor vehicle crash file for 19801990 displayed somewhat smaller percentages, but showed the trend of increasing pedestrian crashes at intersections as age increased. The spatial visual functions of acuity and contrast sensitivity are important in the ability to detect/recognize downstream geometric features such as pavement width transitions, channelized turning lanes, island and median features across the intersection, and any non-reflectorized raised elements at intersections. Two other improvements in modern roundabout design are deflection, which helps to slow entering vehicles, resulting in safer merges with the circulating traffic stream, and flared approaches, which helps to increase capacity by increasing the number of lanes on the approach (Flannery and Datta, 1996). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets This will reduce the possibility that vehicles delayed at the pedestrian crossing will queue back into the roundabout, and gridlock the whole intersection. The effect of any traffic control measure is highly dependent on specific locational characteristics, such as traffic conditions (e.g., volumes, speeds, turning movements), pedestrian volumes and pedestrian mix (e.g., young children, college students, aging adults, persons with physical disabilities), street width, existing traffic controls, area type (e.g., rural, urban, suburban), site distance, crash patterns, presence of enforcement, and numerous other factors. If the signals and markings are not understood, at a minimum there may be delay in making a turn or, in the worst case, a crash could result if a protected operation is assumed where it does not exist. ISD = intersection sight distance (feet). Figure 82. (1993) stated that the provision of intersection sight distance (ISD) is intended to give drivers an opportunity to obtain the information they need to make decisions about whether to proceed, slow, or stop in situations where potentially conflicting vehicles may be present. Protected/permissive phasing resulted in the most severe crashes for all age groups (as determined by a severity index) of the three phasing options. Both kinematic data (vehicle control responses during the turn phase including longitudinal and lateral accelerations, yaw, and speed) and behavioral data (driving errors including vehicle position, lane maintenance, speed, yielding, signaling, visual scanning, adjustment to stimuli/traffic signs, and left-turn gap acceptance) were recorded. Design control for crest vertical curve when S is greater than L. Design control for crest vertical curve when S is less than L. At the same time, street name legends provide useful information only when they can be read and understood by motorists. (1975); Polus and Katz (1978); and Zegeer (1991). Given the positive experience of some practitioners who are early adopters of this treatment, further FYA research is a high priority. Crowley and Seguin (1986) reported that drivers over the age of 60 are excessively involved in wrong-way movements on a per-mile basis. As discussed underDesign Element 4, subsequent analyses established a recommendation for use of an 8.0-s gap size (plus 0.5 s for each additional lane crossed) to adjust the Gap Acceptance to accommodate aging driver needs for increased sight distance. Analyses of wrong-way movements at intersections frequently associate these driving errors with low visibility and restricted sight distance (Vaswani, 1974, 1977; Scifres and Loutzenheiser, 1975) and note that designs that increase the visibility of access points to divided highways and treatments that improve drivers' understanding of proper movements at these locations have been found to reduce the potential for crashes. Understanding these roundabout operational rules is paramount to avoiding wrong-way maneuvers (and their consequent head-on crashes), panic stops by circulating traffic trying to avoid crashing into a driver who does not yield at entry (resulting in rear-end crashes by following circulating drivers), and angle crashes between entering and circulating drivers when an entering driver fails to yield and an approaching driver does not take evasive action. In the open roadway study, they drove their own vehicles. Observations were conducted for 2,377 pedestrians ages 20-59, 511 pedestrians ages 60-65, and 354 pedestrians age 66 and older. Over time the value of 50 ft/in of letter height became the nominal, though arbitrary and disputed, standard. Also mentioned was the difficulty seeing the pavement markings in poor weather (night, fog, rain) when they are less visible, and particularly when they are snow-covered. (1995) that the slower walking speed of older pedestrians is due largely to their shorter stride lengths. Avoid entries and exits with two or more lanes, except for capacity requirements. Pedestrian trappedAt a signalized intersection, a pedestrian is hit when a traffic signal turns red (for the pedestrian) and cross-traffic vehicles start moving. Vehicle turn/mergeThe vehicle turns left or right and strikes the pedestrian. photo illustrates how overhead structures can affect sight lines. Different pavement texture for the walkways will assist the visually impaired pedestrian in locating the crosswalks. Because traffic engineers believed that the problem was increased volume as opposed to nearside priority, traffic circles were generally abandoned in the U.S. Studies conducted in the Netherlands, Victoria Australia, and Western Australia have found significant reductions in crashes and casualty rates (from 60 to 90 percent fewer) at roundabouts converted from the old priority to the yield-on-entry priority. Design recommendations for lane width at intersections follow from consideration of vehicle maneuver requirements and their demands on drivers. In the Jacquemart (1998) synthesis, a study by Brilon (1996) of 34 modern roundabouts in Germany concluded that 98 ft seemed to be the ideal inscribed diameter for a single-lane roundabout. The wording of the educational placard recommended by Knoblauch, et al. In the late 1990s, Abdulsattar, Tarawneh, and McCoy (1996) found that the TURNING TRAFFIC MUST YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS sign was effective in significantly reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts during right turns. Oncoming vehicle speed played an important role in the gap size accepted by drivers, with drivers accepting smaller gaps for the higher major road approach speed than for the lower approach speed scenario. The countdown signal display resulted in a substantial improvement in the understanding of the pedestrian signal display by aging adults. Collectively, the studies described above indicate a positive relationship between available ISD and a reduction in crashes, though the amount of crash reduction that can be expected by a given increase in sight distance may be expected to vary according to the maneuver scenario and existing traffic control at the intersection. In comparison with younger subjects, a significant decline for older subjects has been reported in angular motion sensitivity. Figure 83. In late release timing, the pedestrians are held until a portion of the parallel traffic has turned. This implies that drivers show more sensitivity to oncoming vehicle distance than to oncoming vehicle approach speed. Maintained values in the range of 60 to 80 percent of initial design values are cited as common practice in this publication.
and other roadway features with non-standard stopping sight distance. Numerous studies have found that: (1) protected left-turn control is the safest, with protected/permissive being less safe than protected, but safer than permissive (Fambro and Woods, 1981; Matthais and Upchurch, 1985; Curtis et al., 1988); and (2) transitions from protected-only operations to protected/permissive operations experience crash increases (Cottrell and Allen, 1982; Florida Section of Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1982; Cottrell, 1985; Warren, 1985; Agent, 1987). Of that, 81 percent (2,552 pedestrians) were observed as "walking." Researchers have identified that the right-turn maneuver is more problematic for aging drivers compared with young or middle-aged drivers, presumably as a result of age-related diminished visual, cognitive, and physical capabilities. However, there are cases where it may not be appropriate. In this study, average adults and the elderly had walking speeds of 4.5 ft/s; however, 20 percent of the aging pedestrians crossed at speeds slower than 4.0 ft/s. Data describing the safety impact of RTOR were provided by Compton and Milton (1994) in a report to Congress by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Regarding PRT for Cases III and V, the value of 2.0 s assumed by AASHTO (1994) represents the time necessary for the driver to look in both directions of the roadway, to perceive that there is sufficient time to perform the maneuver safely, and to shift gears, if necessary, prior to starting. Their findings regarding driver age differences in collision types, pre-crash maneuvers, and contributing factors are described below. The Optional Movement Lane Control Sign (R3-6) is required to be located in advance of and/or at the intersection where the regulation applies. Crash types that predominantly involve aging pedestrians at intersections are as follows (Blomberg and Edwards, 1990): Earlier analyses of over 5,300 pedestrian crashes occurring at urban intersections indicated that a significantly greater proportion of pedestrians age 65 and older were hit at signalized intersections than any other group (Robertson, Berger, and Pain, 1977). Thus, recommendations about when and why to use roundabouts to accommodate aging road users remain premature, but an understanding of roundabout task demands that pose special difficulty for seniors allow for certain recommendations regarding preferred practices when a jurisdiction has decided to install a roundabout. Of all the highway safety improvement projects evaluated by FHWA (1996), using data from 1974 to 1995 where before- and after-exposure data were available, intersection illumination was associated with the highest benefit-cost ratio (26.8) in reducing fatal and injury crashes. The Clearview fonts will be referred to as Clear Condensed 100, Clear Condensed 112, Clear 100, and Clear 112 throughout the remainder of this section. A normal-speed road, in this context, includes speeds up to 50 mph, distances up to 328 ft, and sky luminances up to 10,000 cd/m2. This highlights problems aging drivers may have determining acceptable gaps and maneuvering through traffic streams when there is no protective phase.